Speed Thinking: A Review of 'Blink' by Malcolm Gladwell
Published in the New Scientist: 12 February 2005 issue 2486
Paul Marsden on how to seize the moment
Suffering from information overload? Well here’s the cure. You
need to ‘thin-slice’. Thin-slicing is a neat cognitive trick
that involves taking a narrow slice of data, just what you can
capture in the blink of an eye, and letting your intuition do
the work for you. This is the prescription of Blink: The Power
of Thinking without Thinking, the new popular psychology book
from Malcolm Gladwell, staff writer for the New Yorker and
author of the cult business bestseller, The Tipping Point.
Blink introduces us to the power of thin-slicing by way of
example. Take the ‘Love Lab’ at Washington University, where
psychologist John Gottman has been thin-slicing the way couples
interact since the early 1980s. In no more than 15 minutes of
mere observation, Gottman can predict with 90% accuracy whether
a couple will be together in 15 years. Or consider how an art
expert recently ‘thin-sliced’ a 2500 year-old Greek statue in
the blink of an eye and was able to tell it was a fake. Or the
retired soldier whose thin-slicing intuition can outwit the
super-computers of the US Armed Forces.
But the great thing about thin-slicing, argues Gladwell, is that
we can all do it, especially when it come to thin-slicing each
other. Evolution has honed our social intelligence, allowing us
‘read’ people accurately based on fleeting first impressions –
which is why the current trend of speed dating might actually be
a good idea. In fact, we don’t even need to actually meet our
potential future partners in the flesh; just a quick peek in
their bedrooms is enough to accurately guess their key
personality traits.
Blink draws from cognitive psychology to explain how our powers
of thin-slicing intuition have nothing to do with the
supernatural, and everything to do with our naturally evolved
‘adaptive unconsciousness’. Our conscious mind is just the tip
of the cognitive iceberg and what we feel as intuition is really
the result of unconscious rapid cognition, fast and frugal
information processing that goes on subliminally. Thin-slicing
harnesses this powerful adaptive unconsciousness, allowing us to
make smart decisions based on minimal information and minimal
deliberation.
Ironically, Blink only falters in its convincing argument when
we thin-slice it, taking it as an unqualified celebration of
intuition over critical thinking. In fact, it is nothing of the
kind, and Gladwell illustrates how reacting intuitively to a
situation can have disastrous consequences. For example, he
recounts how an undercover police team recently thin-sliced an
ambiguous situation in the Bronx, panicked and shot an innocent
man 41 times. The problem with thin-slicing, Gladwell
correctly explains, is that it uses contextual cues, internal
stereotypes and even prejudice to tell us what to do.
So, to thin-slice or not to thin-slice, that is the question.
Unfortunately, Blink does not provide us with a clear answer.
Gladwell hints that ultimately we should only rely on
thin-slicing when our intuition has been honed by experience and
training. But, he goes on to suggest, this is not as onerous as
it might seem; a mere 30 minutes of training with the experts
back at the Love Lab will have you predicting with 80% accuracy,
and in the blink of an eye, whether couples will remain
together. However, the joy of Blink is not in the final message
that listening to experts instead of our own untrained intuition
is a good idea, but in the intellectual adventure Gladwell takes
us on to get there. Doing what he does best, Gladwell
accompanies us on an exhilarating roller-coaster ride through
the latest highlights of cognitive psychology, making the
science of mind exciting and relevant to all those who have one.
‘Blink’ deserves to be the success that it will certainly
become.
Dr Paul Marsden is a research psychologist at the London School
of Economics
Back to Published Work
|